Only appeared a few years ago, microservices is a trend that is accelerating today. Indeed, the microservices approach offers tangible benefits, including increased scalability, flexibility, agility, and other important benefits. Netflix, Google, Amazon and other technology leaders have successfully moved from monolithic architecture to microservices. Meanwhile, many companies see following this example as the most …
Only appeared a few years ago, microservices is a trend that is accelerating today. Indeed, the microservices approach offers tangible benefits, including increased scalability, flexibility, agility, and other important benefits. Netflix, Google, Amazon and other technology leaders have successfully moved from monolithic architecture to microservices. Meanwhile, many companies see following this example as the most effective way to grow their business.
In contrast, the monolithic approach is the default model for creating software applications. However, its trend is decreasing as building a monolithic application poses a number of challenges related to managing a huge code base, adopting new technology, scaling, deployment, make new changes, etc.
The monolithic approach is outdated and should it be a thing of the past? And is it worth moving the entire application from monolith to microservices? Does microservices application development help you achieve your business goals?
In this article, we will compare microservices to monolithic architectures, highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, and determine which type of software architecture will work best for the business. your. PRINCIPAL STONE ARCHITECTURE
Monolithic architecture is considered a traditional way of building applications. A monolithic application is built as a single, indivisible unit. Typically, such a solution includes a client-side user interface, a server-side application, and a database. It is unified and all functions are managed and served in one place.
Typically, monolithic applications have large code bases and lack modularity. If developers want to update or change something, they will access the same codebase. So they make changes to the entire stack at once.
Highlights of monolithic architecture
Fewer cross-cutting concerns. Cross-cutting concerns are those that affect the entire application, such as logging, processing, caching, and performance monitoring. In a monolithic application, this functional domain is related to only one application, so it is easier to manipulate. Debugging and testing is easier. Unlike microservices architecture, monolithic applications are much easier to debug and test. Since the monolithic application is a single, indivisible unit, you can run your tests from start to finish much faster.
Simple to deploy. Another benefit related to the simplicity of monolithic applications is easier deployment. When it comes to monolithic applications, you don’t have to manage multiple deployments – a single file or directory.
Simple to develop. As long as the monolithic approach is the standard way to build apps, any team of engineers has the knowledge and skills to develop monolithic apps.
Weaknesses of monolithic architecture
Embrace. As a monolithic application scales, it becomes too complex to understand. Moreover, a complex code system in an application is difficult to manage.
Make changes. It would be more difficult to make changes in such a large and complex application with very tight alignment. Any code change affects the entire system, so it must be perfectly coordinated. This makes the overall development process much longer. Ability of extension. You cannot scale components independently, only the entire application.
New technology barriers. It is extremely difficult to apply a new technology in a monolithic application because then the entire application must be rewritten.
MICRO SERVICE ARCHITECTURE
While the monolithic application is a single unified unit, the microservices architecture divides it into a set of smaller independent units. These units run each request process as a separate service. Therefore, all services have their own logic and database and perform specific functions.
In short, the microservices architectural style is an approach to developing an application as a set of small services, each of which runs in its own process and communicates with lightweight mechanisms, usually APIs. HTTP resources.
